From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e512734808cc6a49
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Solymosi <solymosi@tfh-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [Q] GNAT Success stories?
Date: 1997/04/25
Message-ID: <5jqd11$qs0@sun04.tfh-berlin.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 237281522
Organization: TFH-Berlin (Berlin, Germany)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) writes: 

> Hmm.  Seems like "blame the victim" to me.  Here's a guy who claims some
> software is buggy.  And you don't believe him, because he doesn't know
> how to configure his newsreader.  Well, I don't know how to configure my
> newsreader, either (I just hope my internet provider does), but I feel
> quite competent to point out bugs in GNAT, when they exist.
> 
> - Bob
Thanks Bob to save my honor.