From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: afn03257@freenet2.afn.org (Daniel P Hudson)
Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada?
Date: 1997/04/16
Message-ID: <5j2f6g$l2j@huron.eel.ufl.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 235217955
References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <u912rj925.fsf@kastle.com>
 <860706551snz@tsys.demon.co.uk>
Organization: I hate green eggs and SPAM
Reply-To: afn03257@stuff.afn.org "Dan"
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
NNTP-Posting-User: afn03257
Date: 1997-04-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


clines@airmail.net (Kevin Cline) wrote:
>tomw@tsys.demon.co.uk (Tom Wheeley) wrote:


>>Can you buy `gcc' in CompUSA?  I should think that for a lot of people,
>>`gcc' vs. `gnat' would be a better comparison.  (even though they are really
>>more similar than you might think :-)

>No, g++ vs. gnat would be fairer.

gcc is now a C and C++ compiler, the g++ program merely calls gcc
with the C++ specific parameters needed.