From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: kaz@vision.crest.nt.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada?
Date: 1997/04/16
Message-ID: <5j1ann$f20@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 235158788
References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <5itlph$1k9@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>
 <5iui29$iei@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <5ivtcu$puv@huron.eel.ufl.edu>
Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5ivtcu$puv@huron.eel.ufl.edu>,
Daniel P Hudson <afn03257@stuff.afn.org "Dan"> wrote:
>>  I am talking about compiler options (just like setting Visual C for a 
>>"release build").  Again I am confused, what exactly is your point here?
>>I still don't see the diff using Ada.  What are "language features that 
>>let you override >these features (rather than compiler options)"?
>
>Kaz's soul point is to not let you prove that there is ever a condition
       ^^^^ that's sole. But don't take my word for it, I'm just an immigrant.

>in which C should NOT be used. He is just like Scott Nudds, but follows
>a different God that failed.

Say, didn't you just troll with this bit of nonsense, referring to the
IBM PC:

->   Perhaps you knew of a better micro-processor for systems that could
->   fit on the average desktop? It just so happens that the 8086 was
->   state of the art back then.

Can you say, MC68000?