From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4751d44ff54a2c2c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-02 05:54:26 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamfinder.gnilink.net!nwrddc02.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Frank J. Lhota" <NOSPAM.lhota.adarose@verizon.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <3CE3978F.6070704@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net>
 <Xns925A758E8FB6Avictorgiddingsoiscom@192.84.85.25>
 <wccy9buqoi6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <3D46DC69.7C291297@adaworks.com>
 <5ee5b646.0207301613.5b59616c@posting.google.com>
 <yeceldkpm34.fsf@king.cts.com> <wcc65ywhw3s.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <ai8pf9$fip$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <slrnakhqa5.ok.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
 <aibbr8$4ie$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
Subject: Re: 64-bit integers in Ada
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Message-ID: <5iv29.1489$WE4.1289@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 12:54:25 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.157.176.41
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrddc02.gnilink.net 1028292865 141.157.176.41 (Fri,
 02 Aug 2002 08:54:25 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 08:54:25 EDT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27611
Date: 2002-08-02T12:54:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org> wrote in
message news:aibbr8$4ie$1@nh.pace.co.uk...
> Its been a while since I've seen a C compiler for a 6502, but my
> recollection is that the last one I did look at had 16 bits for the type
> int. Please correct me if I'm wrong here - have you seen C compilers for
> this target using 8 bits for the type int?

The C standard requires that 'short int' must include all integers in the
range -32767 .. 32767, and that int includes all the values in 'short'. So
if there ever was a C compiler that implemented int with 8 bits, it was
clearly pre-ANSI.