From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f41074d3f38aa459
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-28 19:37:23 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!news.maz.net!shlink.shn.com!genepi.shnet.org!splinter.shnet.org!ulrich
Date: 28 Mar 1995 08:00:00 +0200
From: ulrich@splinter.shnet.org (Ulrich Klug)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Message-ID: <5ikiTM72qZB@splinter.shnet.org>
References: <1995Mar23.165030.643@nosc.mil>
	<3kvksa$se8@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <SRCTRAN.95Mar26113150@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: Where's Aetech?
X-Newsreader: XP v3.02 R/C2098
X-Charset: ISO-8859-1
Date: 1995-03-28T08:00:00+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Dear Greg !


>
>      And that anyone is happy that one of the side-effects of GNAT was  
to
> drive one of the few Ada businesses into the ground is very sad, the type
> of attitude that drives software entrepreneurs into the arms of other
> languages.
>
> Greg Aharonian



Why in detail was the GNAT-project able to drive Aetech into the ground ?

As far as I know the GNAT-compiler is not validated and programming is not  
very comfortable in comparison with the Integrated Development  
Environments of professional vendors.

Sincerely
Ulrich

## CrossPoint v3.02 R ##