From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: Ada95 to ANSI_C converter
Date: 1997/04/02
Message-ID: <5htg0a$v8v$1@news.nyu.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 230118354
References: <dewar.859432540@merv> <5hfble$4d0$1@news.pacifier.com>
 <dewar.859559977@merv>
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c
Date: 1997-04-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.859559977@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>No one ever expressed serious interest in such a project, but if they did,
>it is certainly something that could be done. Perhaps a person year of
>effort would be needed to complete such a project in a reasonably
>productized manner.

I think that's a bit of an overestimate, but could be true for people who
aren't that familiar with GCC.

Everyone should realize, however, that we're talking about generating
"C" code like:

	r10=r7+r30;
	r72=r8*r9;
	r3=r6+72;
	r28=memory[r3];

....