From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c0f035b936128b6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Craig Franck <clfranck@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Ada95 to ANSI_C converter
Date: 1997/03/28
Message-ID: <5hh1ph$o0h@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 229047251
References: <5hbrah$ctt$1@gail.ripco.com>
 <01bc3a3d$7734db20$63f482c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>
 <5henq6$b3m$1@gail.ripco.com> <dewar.859526751@merv>
Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c
Date: 1997-03-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:
>Jennifer said
>
><,Because C is NOT an OO language, and C is only a subset of C++.
>We can not convert C++ code back to C.>>
>
>Of course C++ can be translated to C, that's exactly what the original
>C++ processor does.
>

While both your assertions are true, I would point out that the
language cfront had to deal with was less complex than ANSI C++.

-- 
Craig
clfranck@worldnet.att.net
Manchester, NH
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and
won't change the subject -- Winston Churchill