From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b99897135d6631cc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Dmitry A. Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: memory management and productivity
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:23:11 +0200
Message-ID: <5g6dd059kknghippkb2jri3m8l76kidtcu@4ax.com>
References: <bebbba07.0406162056.334745ed@posting.google.com>
 <40d15023$1_1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net>
 <bebbba07.0406181510.37b8f5e2@posting.google.com>
 <cb0vjl$8hp$1@sparta.btinternet.com>
 <bebbba07.0406202016.1f15c133@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de tJt0jnp4IgH0h5z0XJXPygx/eD87dwnJqn2gQMMy9NG56Qvw4=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1728
Date: 2004-06-21T10:23:11+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 20 Jun 2004 21:16:16 -0700, 18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) wrote:

>Well, if initialize and finalize are fundamentally no different than
>constructors and destructors, then I conclude that Ada does not have
>automated memory management any more than C++ has it. (I may be a bit
>slow, but I catch on eventually.)

The difference is that in Ada there is much lesser need in objects
allocated in the heap. That makes things a lot easier and safer.
Moreover it is also much more efficient, especially in a parallel
environment.

--
Regards,
Dmitry Kazakov
www.dmitry-kazakov.de