From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac7b7bb8bd6ab254,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ig25@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Thomas Koenig) Subject: GNAT for Unix systems programming? Date: 1997/03/11 Message-ID: <5g3iao$agt@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 224647295 Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Karlsruhe_(TH),_Germany_?= Reply-To: Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I'd like to know how good GNAT is for systems programming under Unix, especially for networking. Is there any standard for interfacing with the Berkeley socket interface and auxiliary routines (inet_ntoa and all the rest)? Is this standard implemented anywhere? Or should I just give up, and continue writing in C? -- 74 a3 53 cc 0b 19