From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d053083f91c271b2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: geert@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl (Geert Bosch)
Subject: Re: floating point problem
Date: 1997/03/06
Message-ID: <5fm8dj$9c@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 223500393
References: <5f0faa$6ok@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net>
 <331ace4d.1427558395@news.mwci.net> <dewar.857535729@merv>
Organization: La Calandre Infortunee
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar (dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu) wrote:
 ``GNAT does NOT support the x86 without coprocessor, so it will not work
   on an SX unless you install a separate coprocessor.''

Why do you think the OS/2 version of GNAT doesn't work on a x86 system
without co-processor? 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the OS/2 version of GNAT should just
work fine on any 80x86 with x >= 3, since OS/2 emulates the co-processor
if it is not present. 

Regards,
   Geert
-- 
--  E-Mail: geert@sun3.iaf.nl    
--    `` If trainstations are places where trains stop, 
--	 then what are workstations? ''