From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5997b4b7b514f689 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ig25@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Thomas Koenig) Subject: Re: Reading a line of arbitrary length Date: 1997/03/04 Message-ID: <5fh5g0$80h@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 222997259 References: <5ds40o$rpo@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <1997Mar3.082830.1@eisner> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Karlsruhe_(TH),_Germany_?= Reply-To: Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In comp.lang.ada, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote: >I strongly disagree that GC >should not be simply transparent, and I do not like the idea of >standardizing explicit programmer control, whatever that might be. In a realtime application, I do not want to have time-critical parts interrupted by GC. -- 74 a3 53 cc 0b 19