From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2fcd8539360f166e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-17 17:43:43 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: britt@acm.org (Britt Snodgrass)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 / Ada / Cygwin / Win2k ?
Date: 17 Oct 2002 17:43:43 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5fe90c1a.0210171643.5d60d85f@posting.google.com>
References: <3DAC4528.81F57BBD@despammed.com> <aoibfe$cq2$1@ns.omskelecom.ru>
 <4519e058.0210161111.217a8c6b@posting.google.com>
 <tpGcnR5vLekItzOgXTWcpA@News.GigaNews.Com> <u65w1mvd1.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <bwAr9.1853$c6.2462@bos-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
 <aomnqd$267l$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <4xCr9.1511$Bd4.11686@dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.230.159.147
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1034901823 3367 127.0.0.1 (18 Oct 2002 00:43:43
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Oct 2002 00:43:43 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29888
Date: 2002-10-18T00:43:43+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com> wrote in message news:<4xCr9.1511$Bd4.11686@dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com>...
> > Why don't you use the pre-built version at
> > ftp://cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/3.14p/winnt/
> 
> Because that is not an integrated GCC suite.
> 
> > Is there some reason why the executables must be built to use the cygwin
> > dll?
> 
> No.  I just have to find or build one that works.
> On the GCC web pages all the ones that have passed tests
> (and all the ones that haven't) say they were built with CygWin.

Have you seen this one?

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-05/msg02644.html