From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:40c8:: with SMTP id n191mr6456267jaa.14.1553253005874;
        Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7d82:: with SMTP id j2mr5903667otn.270.1553253005646;
 Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.215.MISMATCH!78no103102itl.0!news-out.google.com!l81ni138itl.0!nntp.google.com!78no103101itl.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 04:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b196da6e-4614-42f9-9147-b1708c6e5094@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <b196da6e-4614-42f9-9147-b1708c6e5094@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5fb80936-f660-47dd-9cf5-73d35406782f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Intervention needed?
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:10:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55928
Date: 2019-03-22T04:10:05-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

See in: https://users.rust-lang.org/t/if-ada-is-already-very-safe-why-rust/=
21911/47

> He also told me that Ada compilers aren=E2=80=99t allowed to do certain k=
inds of optimizations that for example c, c++ (and Rust and other PL via LL=
VM) are doing.

How true is this?