From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b15ce5ed141cce4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: pontius@btv.vnet.ibm.com (Dale Pontius) Subject: Re: Ada Success Story II Date: 1997/02/27 Message-ID: <5f4d06$1644@mdnews.btv.ibm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 221849210 References: <3315C9E8.72D8@lmtas.lmco.com> Organization: IBM Microelectronics Division Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-02-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3315C9E8.72D8@lmtas.lmco.com>, Ken Garlington writes: > > I can't comment on the Titan 4B, since it's not my division. > There may be a press release available on www.lmco.com in the > near future providing more details on the launch. > > Speaking of press releases, here's another Ada success story in > the works from _my_ division of Lockheed Martin: > Too bad the press release doesn't mention Ada, just that they felt it was a successful development cycle. Of course the proof is in the flying. There was a flyoff between the YF22 and the YF23, which the YF22 won. What were they doing for flight software on the flyoff? I could believe hacked F16 software, or something like that, except isn't the F22 the first plane to use thrust vectoring? It seems about time for CJIII to jump in, with these Ada success stories showing up. (for rebuttal, of course) Dale Pontius (NOT speaking for IBM)