From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.98.1.215 with SMTP id 206mr17148513pfb.1.1454226393226; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:46:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.104.163 with SMTP id gf3mr244259obb.5.1454226393162; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:46:33 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!o2no635825iga.0!news-out.google.com!l1ni2331igd.0!nntp.google.com!h5no1007079igh.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 23:46:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=80.119.168.92; posting-account=O3LyFwoAAACc1uh60ZcOUmAGdDmGsEcV NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.119.168.92 References: <31402e8a-3d66-4b0b-b7ad-5bb34b17aa5e@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <5f0718c5-5354-473c-82d9-c8867098bc75@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: IoT / IIoT stuff From: slos Injection-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 07:46:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29297 Date: 2016-01-30T23:46:32-08:00 List-Id: Le mercredi 27 janvier 2016 17:31:43 UTC+1, slos a =E9crit=A0: > Le mercredi 27 janvier 2016 06:18:42 UTC+1, Per Sandberg a =E9crit=A0: > > Well from my point of view the the important aspect is that we agree on= =20 > > a reasonable number of protocols on different levels in in the=20 > > communication stacks and the protocols and standards (official or=20 > > defecto) may be: IP, TCP, UDP, Spread, 0Mq, MQTT, AMQP, Protobuff,=20 > > Json, Corba, DDS, or GumboJumbo. > >=20 > > I actually don't care which one and on what level we are talking , but = I=20 > > do care that the community agree on communication standards that are=20 > > language neutral an includes the full semantics of the data flows from= =20 > > application down to the lowest level of transport. > >=20 > > The 0MQ bindings and the MQTT bindings was something I needed for some= =20 > > small projects (hobby and commercial). > >=20 > > You are quite right concerning DDS there is an Ada binding to the RTI= =20 > > implementation of DDS where I also was "involved". > >=20 > > I think that the next step would be to get a protobuffer implementation= out. > >=20 > > /Persan > >=20 > > Den 2016-01-21 kl. 14:25, skrev slos: > > > Some implementations may provide an Ada binding. > > > I have found that most are open source and commercially supported. > > > > > > Do some of you have some thoughts and experiences to share on these s= ubjects ? >=20 > Hello Persan, >=20 > Thanks for providing the mosquitto-ada binding. >=20 > I've been trying it on my Debian Jessie and I've succeeded to have it wor= king although provided Mosquitto libs are 1.3.4-2 where you state 1.4 is ne= eded. > I've had some trouble with the relocate scenario but things are fine with= the static one. > I don't know yet if it has something to do with the old GPS provided or s= ome stupid error on my side. > Anyway, it looks like it may not be long before "Ada for Automation" floo= ds the cloud ! >=20 > Best Regards, > St=E9phane LOS > http://slo-ist.fr/ada4autom Hello Persan, On my Debian Sid machine where Mosquitto is at version 1.4.7.1 it works too= . And the relocatable option is fine too. I'd just omitted to install the lib= rary or run the tests with : LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D../../lib ./mosquitto-tests-main Thanks ! Best Regards, St=E9phane LOS http://slo-ist.fr/ada4autom