From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6aa6d133611419f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-28 04:09:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Thought this was interesting (OT) Date: 28 Aug 2002 04:09:45 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0208280309.3d913d82@posting.google.com> References: <3D6688E1.3A1797CC@san.rr.com> <1030464758.505647@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.101.126.29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1030532985 1652 127.0.0.1 (28 Aug 2002 11:09:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Aug 2002 11:09:45 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28484 Date: 2002-08-28T11:09:45+00:00 List-Id: "SteveD" wrote in message news:... > I get the same result with ObjectAda 7.2 and GNAT 3.14p, but interestingly I > dont get the reset if I try the equivalent program in Microsoft C++. Then it is not the equivalent program! You can always write a C program that does exactly the same thing as any GNAT program, if you try and do not get the same effect, you simply did not write an equivalent program, but rather a similar but not identical program. Since this is a pretty bizarre bug in the operating system, it is not so surprising that a slight change would make it go away.