From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b30240b5a381bbf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-24 14:57:32 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: mailers, quoting text etc. (was Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?) Date: 24 Aug 2002 14:57:32 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0208241357.39e0956a@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1030226252 29280 127.0.0.1 (24 Aug 2002 21:57:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Aug 2002 21:57:32 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28376 Date: 2002-08-24T21:57:32+00:00 List-Id: "Robert C. Leif" wrote in message news:... > I would be surprised if some Microsoft Wizardry made any unseen additions. Really? Typical microsoft mailers make the unseen addition of completely useless HTML by default that is a) redundant and serves no purpose b) wastes bandwidth and clutters up databases c) presents a security risk (HTML attachments are not benign!) But I guess none of these (especially c) has ever been of any concern to MS :-)