From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,18f7f6e041b3e0bf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-22 20:23:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Decimal Floating types Date: 22 Aug 2002 20:23:12 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0208221923.136f8a7b@posting.google.com> References: <5ee5b646.0208160721.7ae05a3@posting.google.com> <3D5D2529.8070501@cogeco.ca> <5ee5b646.0208170252.181eec9d@posting.google.com> <3D5E5E14.5010405@cogeco.ca> <5ee5b646.0208191626.288b143d@posting.google.com> <3D652A33.B5FE93B9@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1030072992 5950 127.0.0.1 (23 Aug 2002 03:23:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Aug 2002 03:23:12 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28331 Date: 2002-08-23T03:23:12+00:00 List-Id: Richard Riehle wrote in message news:<3D652A33.B5FE93B9@adaworks.com>... > Actually, the TO is not illegal, according to the syntax > chart in my closest-to-hand COBOL book. Yes, but it is not used in practice, at least in my experience, and I prefer to use typical style when I quote COBOL (or any other language) :-)