From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b30240b5a381bbf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-21 12:34:05 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?
Date: 21 Aug 2002 12:34:05 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0208211134.331069@posting.google.com>
References: <rteplug7d1nqc7l9a0j3lsnujdtjfkhr8e@4ax.com>
 <5ee5b646.0208191613.21291d5@posting.google.com>
 <ajt1ae$1ebok8$1@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>
 <5ee5b646.0208201029.3e4b09e@posting.google.com>
 <ajvqd1$1eh7ep$2@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.49
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1029958445 22501 127.0.0.1 (21 Aug 2002 19:34:05
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Aug 2002 19:34:05 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28291
Date: 2002-08-21T19:34:05+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A.Kazakov <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message news:<ajvqd1$1eh7ep$2@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>...

> True, but should not it? From my point of view it could be a very good time 
> for Ada there. People are starting to use multitasking, wireless 
> communication etc in their embedded systems. To have a 32-bit controller is 
> no more cosidered too expensive. Shouldn't we use this situation?

Sounds like you believe this is a great business opportunity 
So why not persue it?