From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,68f66270391b820 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-29 06:37:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Slices of 2d arrays? Date: 29 Jul 2002 06:37:55 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0207290537.3828b30c@posting.google.com> References: <5ee5b646.0207241633.6518ef31@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1027949875 11267 127.0.0.1 (29 Jul 2002 13:37:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Jul 2002 13:37:55 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27447 Date: 2002-07-29T13:37:55+00:00 List-Id: "Chad R. Meiners" wrote in message news:... > Yes, please cite this principle. I would like to see where this principle > was first stated since it does seem to be a rather intuitive principle. Prof Dr Fritz L. Bauer An important member of WG2.1, the group that developed Algol-68. If you do a search for Bauer Algol-68 you will get a lot of hits (the top ones are all in German). He formulated this principle in the 60's. I do not have the exact reference, I will track it down. It was one of the guiding principles in the Algol-68 design, and whenever we violated it, we were sure to carefully understand the trade-offs.