From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,68f66270391b820 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-28 16:54:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Slices of 2d arrays? +HPF Date: 28 Jul 2002 16:54:55 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0207281554.20f6762@posting.google.com> References: <5ee5b646.0207241633.6518ef31@posting.google.com> <3D3FF756.6010907@nbi.dk> <3D402036.171C354B@san.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1027900496 29763 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2002 23:54:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Jul 2002 23:54:56 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27440 Date: 2002-07-28T23:54:56+00:00 List-Id: Darren New wrote in message news:<3D402036.171C354B@san.rr.com>... > Another part of the problem is again a lack of libraries, I expect. About 15 > years ago, I had in my hands an ACM publication which was basically 60 or 70 > microfiche foils full of FORTRAN listings of numerical algorithms of all > kinds. Having this sort of resource at hand for FORTRAN and no such resource > at hand for Ada is a compelling argument against switching to Ada, methinks. Doesn't compell me! There is no problem in calling these standard Fortran library units from an Ada program when this makes sense.