From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,71c41b6f4d72158c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-13 15:10:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: if X in 1..35000 versus Boolean Date: 13 Jul 2002 15:10:40 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0207131410.407b39c7@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1026598240 20764 127.0.0.1 (13 Jul 2002 22:10:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jul 2002 22:10:41 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27070 Date: 2002-07-13T22:10:41+00:00 List-Id: Jan Prazak wrote in message news:... > type num : (1, 2, 3, 4); I have no idea what this is supposed to be, but it is not even a reasonable approximation of an Ada type declaration. > -- this should be the same as: if 3 in (1,2,3,4); This is not even vaguely Ada, the right operand of a membership test cannot be an aggregate