From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,daf1e35a4e978e9d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-20 09:05:37 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: have to use unrestricted access but just what about access
Date: 20 Jun 2002 09:05:35 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0206200805.7c4be786@posting.google.com>
References: <0x8Q8.6779$ZP1.1263481@news11-gui.server.ntli.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1024589137 10993 127.0.0.1 (20 Jun 2002 16:05:37
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Jun 2002 16:05:37 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26496
Date: 2002-06-20T16:05:37+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:<0x8Q8.6779$ZP1.1263481@news11-gui.server.ntli.net>...
> Hi,
> 
> How can the unrestricted_access attribute be replaced by 
> just access in the following code?


The referenced post in this thread is an excellent lesson
in when how to seriously misuse the Unrestricted_Access
attribute. Of course it is no worse than Address, since
it is exactly equivalent to taking 'Address and then
applying an unchecked conversion to get the access type
in question.

But even a cursory examination of this code will show
that it is very likely to generate a dangling pointer.