From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1983ae2deb642ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-09 05:13:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada -vs- GNAT Date: 9 Jun 2002 05:13:51 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0206090413.b9b56c1@posting.google.com> References: <5ee5b646.0206080414.67b7ab3b@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.247 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1023624831 8743 127.0.0.1 (9 Jun 2002 12:13:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jun 2002 12:13:51 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25590 Date: 2002-06-09T12:13:51+00:00 List-Id: "SteveD" wrote in message news:... > I agree with this for most of the gnat specific attributes. But find the > "img" attribute hard to justify. Usually being terse is not a goal in Ada. The 'Img attribute is intended solely for debugging purposes. It is poor style to use it in any other context. One thing to realize about 'Img is that it is only partially implemented according to its original spec, since the intention is that it be usable for composite objects.