From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,345c9fcf5a67a99f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-29 19:53:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ON Topic: Ada for CP/M Date: 29 May 2002 19:53:16 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205291853.683641af@posting.google.com> References: <3CED2E66.DD15C13D@despammed.com> <2TvH8.1710$Np5.1619@nwrddc01.gnilink.net> <3CEEA2C6.883EC224@sympatico.ca> <5ee5b646.0205250319.324e9ff8@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0205251457.788ad9b6@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022727196 1793 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2002 02:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 May 2002 02:53:16 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24976 Date: 2002-05-30T02:53:16+00:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" wrote in message news:... > Considering you can do a full implementation of Ada for a machine that has > *no* operating system whatsoever, that isn't exactly a bold and daring > claim. :-) You miss the point. Of course CP/M is perectly adequate to support Ada from a functional view, but typical CP/M machines have VERY little memory, typically not more than 64K bytes, and often less, and it is a little daring to say you can fit a full Ada run-time in that small a space :-)