From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d2c21e8238e985b5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-29 02:54:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Extended modal types Date: 29 May 2002 02:54:54 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205290154.4bf06e4f@posting.google.com> References: <3CEDFF90.B94D7E32@yahoo.com> <5ee5b646.0205250757.60c9715a@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022666094 6722 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2002 09:54:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 May 2002 09:54:54 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24913 Date: 2002-05-29T09:54:54+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote in message news:... > Robert, > > Your history is slightly wrong. I never wanted to have non-binary > modular types, and I agree with you that they are a mistake. OK, sorry about that! So too bad you did not manage to eliminate them :-)