From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbd95a41dd4f1d0e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-28 18:28:38 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Sockets Date: 28 May 2002 18:28:37 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205281728.65b97cb9@posting.google.com> References: <3ceb5091@news.comindico.com.au> <5ee5b646.0205221834.653e070a@posting.google.com> <83iH8.97025$Po6.204052@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022635718 28769 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2002 01:28:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 May 2002 01:28:38 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24887 Date: 2002-05-29T01:28:38+00:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote in message news:... > I had problems with AdaSockets, I found GNAT.Sockets much easier to > get on with. (Weren't they by the same author?) Well GNAT.Sockets is part of GNAT, and authorship there is a shared activity. We never implement anything like this without a general discussion of the API. For sure GNAT.Sockets had the AdaSockets as very visible input, so any differences between these packages are 100% intentional :-)