From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,345c9fcf5a67a99f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 15:41:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Microsoft takes on ACT Date: 25 May 2002 15:41:29 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205251441.2e9489fb@posting.google.com> References: <4519e058.0205230724.38617c60@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022366489 13570 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2002 22:41:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 May 2002 22:41:29 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24804 Date: 2002-05-25T22:41:29+00:00 List-Id: sk wrote in message news:... > Does a "smart-bomb" hitting the target constitute a > release of the application ? I know there is an implicit smiley here, but still, just to answer this, of course such delivery systems would almost never be under the GPL so this is an (entertaining) rhetorical question