From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1983ae2deb642ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 08:34:19 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada -vs- GNAT Date: 25 May 2002 08:34:18 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205250734.372ca7b1@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022340859 27103 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2002 15:34:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 May 2002 15:34:19 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24762 Date: 2002-05-25T15:34:19+00:00 List-Id: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:... > I am not in a position to say whether GNAT currently has > such an option. Sure you are! The documentation is freely available :-) See my previous post on pragma Restrictions. That feature has been in GNAT for a long long time.