From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1983ae2deb642ab
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 04:04:23 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada -vs- GNAT
Date: 25 May 2002 04:04:22 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205250304.3ea43104@posting.google.com>
References: <sXCH8.103053$Po6.225647@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>
 <x7vlma8g8m9.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022324663 15666 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2002 11:04:23
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 May 2002 11:04:23 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24745
Date: 2002-05-25T11:04:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message news:<x7vlma8g8m9.fsf@pushface.org>...

> Of course pragma Warnings is implementation-defined too.

But absolutely essential in my view. Because it is very important to always
compile with warnings turned on, but it is in the nature of warnings to
generate false positives sometimes, and you need a way of turning them off.

Robert dewar
Ada Core Technologies