From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbd95a41dd4f1d0e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-22 19:34:46 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Sockets Date: 22 May 2002 19:34:46 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205221834.653e070a@posting.google.com> References: <3ceb5091@news.comindico.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1022121286 12610 127.0.0.1 (23 May 2002 02:34:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 May 2002 02:34:46 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24556 Date: 2002-05-23T02:34:46+00:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" wrote in message news:... > Claw.Sockets has been tested on all of the Windows compilers, it is not > specific to a single compiler as GNAT.Sockets is. > > Randy Brukardt. Incidentally, I don't know whether or not GNAT.Sockets would work on other windows compilers, it might well. Most certainly we have not bothered to test this out :-)