From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,923a044bad102ebc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-18 22:53:23 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 released
Date: 18 May 2002 22:53:22 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205182153.96015a@posting.google.com>
References: <3ce3a7de.6340210@news.essex.ac.uk>
 <IbOE8.2475$UR2.260071@news11-gui.server.ntli.net>
 <5ee5b646.0205161408.47a7f726@posting.google.com>
 <ac4g5m$cbk$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
 <slrnaec7a8.gou.adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
 <PmtF8.29827$sg2.7831839@typhoon.ne.ipsvc.net>
 <5ee5b646.0205181220.66cba6c2@posting.google.com>
 <a9BF8.31646$sg2.8197256@typhoon.ne.ipsvc.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1021787602 8989 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2002 05:53:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2002 05:53:22 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24366
Date: 2002-05-19T05:53:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jeffrey Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com> wrote in message news:<a9BF8.31646$sg2.8197256@typhoon.ne.ipsvc.net>...
> P.S. I am sure I said something above that conflicts with 
> my first statement about not arguing with Robert about 
> GNAT

In fact everything you said makes perfect sense. No one
is saying the GNAT in 3.1 will fail on all programs, just that it does
not meet our QA criteria yet and we know of
too many programs on which it does fail.