From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-16 18:19:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Compilers Date: 16 May 2002 18:19:02 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205161719.3cef4306@posting.google.com> References: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> <3CE2C8FD.CDD0E75B@nbi.dk> <3ce2e29f.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de> <3ce3ff73.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1021598342 5869 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2002 01:19:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2002 01:19:02 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24240 Date: 2002-05-17T01:19:02+00:00 List-Id: "Kai Schuelke" wrote in message news:<3ce3ff73.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de>... > what made me feel that Aonix is more "standard" was a > combination of some minor experiences we made at our Ada > school At this stage all the Ada 95 compilers that are available are sufficiently conformant to the standard that it is VERY unlikely that beginning students would run into any discrepancies in any compiler, so these "minor experiences" were probably misinterpreted.