From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1c770e1e9b36d57d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-08 06:05:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Where is the GNAT source code Date: 8 May 2002 06:05:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205080505.13997da3@posting.google.com> References: <3CD85E98.7090000@netscape.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1020863119 11717 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2002 13:05:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 May 2002 13:05:19 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23719 Date: 2002-05-08T13:05:19+00:00 List-Id: "Per Sandbergs" wrote in message news:... > Hi, > The sources are now within GCC so i thing the easiest way to get them is at > at the folowing location > http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html One caution here is that these sources are specifically for building with GCC 3, and still are work in progress in the sense that there are significant failures with this version against our test suite for all architectures. The sources at gnu.org do not correspond to any release of GNAT Professional (or earlier public versions). So if you want sources that match a particular version, you need to go get them somewhere else. Note that the sources for the run-time library are with every version of GNAT, so you never need to run around looking for these. Note also that whoever provided you with the binary of GNAT had a legal obligation to provide you with information on how to get the corresponding sources. It is illegal to redistribute GNAT without providing this information (since it violates FSF and ACT copyrights to do so). So I suggest that you go wherever you got the binary for, and get the sources from there. By the way, care to tell us why you want the sources (always interesting to know what people are doing with them :-) Robert Dewar Ada Core Technologies