From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,380eb3e330e4b3e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-05 17:44:20 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Executable size with GNAT for Windows and Linux
Date: 5 May 2002 17:44:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205051644.38bf4248@posting.google.com>
References: <m3znzev025.fsf@jupiter.solar.system>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1020645860 22514 127.0.0.1 (6 May 2002 00:44:20
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 May 2002 00:44:20 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23567
Date: 2002-05-06T00:44:20+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> wrote in message news:<m3znzev025.fsf@jupiter.solar.system>...
> I've found the size of executables to differ considerably 
> under Windows and Linux

That's expected. Most likely you are using shared libraries under one
and not the other. The comparison is therefore
irrelevant.

Impossible to be sure, since you gave no idea of what versions of
either compiler you are running.