From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1208117d36fb121 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-14 13:01:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: System.Address'Size - not a static integer expression? Date: 14 Apr 2002 13:01:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204141201.1ffab2d8@posting.google.com> References: <665e587a.0203060957.3682edf7@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0203061721.36d42541@posting.google.com> <3C877185.1CF93423@despammed.com> <7f1fa3aa.0203081034.12a7bd11@posting.google.com> <3C891463.C4C09795@despammed.com> <5ee5b646.0204072057.48d33742@posting.google.com> <3CB1B473.CF6E93AD@despammed.com> <5ee5b646.0204091754.5dcfd16d@posting.google.com> <3CB47947.466E0E81@despammed.com> <5ee5b646.0204121220.606ecc36@posting.google.com> <3CB74D37.973A4C19@despammed.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1018814480 11496 127.0.0.1 (14 Apr 2002 20:01:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Apr 2002 20:01:20 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22528 Date: 2002-04-14T20:01:20+00:00 List-Id: Wes Groleau wrote in message news:<3CB74D37.973A4C19@despammed.com>... > If that's true, both GNAT and Apex were wrong to reject > the code I was speaking of. Just to clarify here: the type in question was a *RECORD* type, surely you cannot think that *any* record type can possibly qualify as a static *scalar* subtype :-) GNAT and Apex were right to reject this, and I must say I find this a very drawn out thread for a relatively simple semantic issue.