From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e151cd4e58019c6c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-09 21:08:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Newbie: Best Ada Compiler for MS Windows ? Date: 9 Apr 2002 21:08:13 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204092008.7a6a41bc@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1018411694 8215 127.0.0.1 (10 Apr 2002 04:08:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Apr 2002 04:08:14 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22294 Date: 2002-04-10T04:08:14+00:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org wrote in message news:... > It is painfull to realize today's newbies using the > "free" compiler won't have that. Hmmm .. it is painful to see misinformation like this from someone who should know better than to make such statements without checking. The statement is of course false!