From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4dcb75e86b22b9a6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-05 07:44:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interfacing ADA to C++ classes with parameters Date: 5 Apr 2002 07:44:51 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204050744.58d9e842@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1018021492 12395 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2002 15:44:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Apr 2002 15:44:52 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22151 Date: 2002-04-05T15:44:52+00:00 List-Id: "John Haddon" wrote in message news:... > Does > anyone know of an automatic tool for defining the binding > between ADA and C++, C2ADA does not cope with a lot of > C++ constructs. SGI has such a tool, but as far as I know they have never released it (it is based on a proprietary C++ front end).