From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,21f9679c40f65a8c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-02 17:02:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14? Date: 2 Apr 2002 17:02:10 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204021702.bb04357@posting.google.com> References: <3CA97235.974C8641@NO.SPAM.PLEASE.emw.ericsson.se> <5ee5b646.0204020818.1c6d9799@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1017795731 32115 127.0.0.1 (3 Apr 2002 01:02:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Apr 2002 01:02:11 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22025 Date: 2002-04-03T01:02:11+00:00 List-Id: "Sergey Koshcheyev" wrote in message news:... > So the second operand of "**" has to be of type Natural, > regardless of the type of the first operand. Good going Sergey, I was wondering when someone might actually look up the declaration of "**". After all the diagnostic said that no matching "**" was declared, you would think the first reaction would be to go look at the declared "**" and see why it does not match :-)