From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d64ad65e3565357 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-25 16:42:21 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada for Palm ? Date: 25 Mar 2002 16:42:21 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0203251642.1c6aaf02@posting.google.com> References: <5ee5b646.0203221928.6ff024c@posting.google.com> <3c9c5ae9_2@news.tm.net.my> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1017103341 18839 127.0.0.1 (26 Mar 2002 00:42:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Mar 2002 00:42:21 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21662 Date: 2002-03-26T00:42:21+00:00 List-Id: Samuel Tardieu wrote in message news:... > On 23/03, Adrian Hoe wrote: > > Have a look at a typical GNAT executable (not including the runtime), you > will see that it is unlikely to go under 8MB (or even 16MB) of size. Let's not exaggerate now, the gnat1 executable on the x86 is much smaller than that (on my OS/2 machine, the exact size is 3366916 bytes).