From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,462a4f123e2d4476 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-23 03:52:18 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: not handled exceptions Date: 23 Mar 2002 03:52:18 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0203230352.7095fff0@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1016884338 19849 127.0.0.1 (23 Mar 2002 11:52:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Mar 2002 11:52:18 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21576 Date: 2002-03-23T11:52:18+00:00 List-Id: Michal Nowikowski wrote in message news:... > Hello > > I've got problem with exceptions. It is my code: Always, always post an ENTIRE program when you ask for help. Do not assume you know how to select the relevant section. For the code you posted, the behavior you described is quite reasonable, depending on what else is there in your program. If you post fragments, then people start guessing what the rest of the program might be, and you get a bunch of replies that is even more unreliable than usual!