From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d2cba5965c7bfcd5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-04 02:31:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 64bit access to an array of 8bit values Date: 4 Mar 2002 02:31:11 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0203040231.3725dcc6@posting.google.com> References: <3C823A1A.6030006@users.sf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1015237872 1326 127.0.0.1 (4 Mar 2002 10:31:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Mar 2002 10:31:12 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20754 Date: 2002-03-04T10:31:12+00:00 List-Id: "David C. Hoos, Sr." wrote in message news:... > How about something like this? and then suggests using address clauses. Yes, that will work, but really the use of unchecked conversion of pointer types is so much closer to what the original question asked for!