From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,235659b21b3d24ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-03 05:54:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 3.14p Binary for OS/2. Was: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? Date: 3 Mar 2002 05:54:54 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0203030554.2c3bf956@posting.google.com> References: <2t2r7.26711$QK.21818615@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com> <5ee5b646.0109221629.62a32528@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0109300758.4e09662a@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0203020900.6f28c05d@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1015163694 7595 127.0.0.1 (3 Mar 2002 13:54:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Mar 2002 13:54:54 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20721 Date: 2002-03-03T13:54:54+00:00 List-Id: DWParsons@T-Online.de (Dave Parsons) wrote in message news:... > On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 17:00:53, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote: > > > > > Messages like this should be addressed to report@gnat.com > > No one from ACT regularly reads CLA, and we don't process > > any reports or requests like this from CLA. > > > > Thanks again for this work! > > Ok, thanks. I'll use that address next time. > BTW, is there a better place, newsgroup or mailing list, to > discuss build related problems? My suggestion is to get involved with the work on GCC 3 at www.gnu.org, and work towards getting the latest GCC port (and GNAT) up and running on OS/2. I don't know who else might be working on that, but that is the community interested in build issues, but only with GCC 3. At this stage GCC 2.8 is not of general interest. > > Cheers, > Dave