From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,539c04254abf1b37
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-28 21:07:01 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: compiler benchmark comparisons
Date: 28 Feb 2002 21:07:00 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202282107.6f3dd89a@posting.google.com>
References: <3C74E519.3F5349C4@baesystems.com> <u3czoxbjm.fsf@telus.net>
 <VuSe8.61199$K14.517462149@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <uzo1vx3w2.fsf@telus.net>
 <JmVe8.61213$nL7.532654192@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <a5hp7k$8q61@news.cis.okstate.edu> <3C7D37FD.F67F7067@despammed.com>
 <17247c3d.0202271553.68aaf78d@posting.google.com>
 <338040f8.0202271819.373f733a@posting.google.com>
 <a5lbnd$jsn$6@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <338040f8.0202281012.31593a2@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1014959221 31428 127.0.0.1 (1 Mar 2002 05:07:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Mar 2002 05:07:01 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20629
Date: 2002-03-01T05:07:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

andreatta@mail.chem.sc.edu (Dan Andreatta) wrote in message news:<338040f8.0202281012.31593a2@posting.google.com>...
> In that case, with -O2, the gap between Ada and the rest 
> widens, yelding these times to
> compile the same code:
> 
> GNAT     250 sec
> g77       13
> gcc        5
> 
> The run times were around 0.2 sec for gcc and 0.5 sec for 
> GNAT (dumping the output).

First of all I think you mean gnu-c here (or you can just
say c in this context if you like), gcc is the GNU compiler
collection, and includes all three of these languages as
well as many others.

Second, if the gnu-c code runs 2-3 times as fast as the
C code it is simply NOT the same code. Usually when we look at
examples like this in detail, we discover that what
people think are "identical" programs are in fact totally
different and apples and oranges are being compared (*)

An odd phrase, what's so wrong about comparing oranges on
apples. I think I prefer oranges in general :-) :