From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,448990452c132610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-28 21:02:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The making of compilers Date: 28 Feb 2002 21:02:08 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202282102.7aeb0a63@posting.google.com> References: <3c7ad99f.19503740@news.cis.dfn.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1014958928 31324 127.0.0.1 (1 Mar 2002 05:02:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Mar 2002 05:02:08 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20628 Date: 2002-03-01T05:02:08+00:00 List-Id: "tony gair" wrote in message news:... > I was also very interested to hear the responses of M. > Criley and 99% of R Dewar's who both gave > interesting examples of constructing their own compilers Very entertaining response (especially the 99% :-) :-)