From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1805b4f4ebff22bd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-24 22:07:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: patch to Gnat 3.14p NT posted Date: 24 Feb 2002 22:07:36 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202242207.6b8fcbfa@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1014617256 13810 127.0.0.1 (25 Feb 2002 06:07:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Feb 2002 06:07:36 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20346 Date: 2002-02-25T06:07:36+00:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org wrote in message news: It's not clear to me how common this hardware > defect is, but these are not obscure chipset vendors. No but you are quite unlikely to have an old PCI machine with this bug in it. We have not had any reports from any of our customers of running into this hardware problem