From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c459ff0adb576bc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-23 14:48:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Refactoring and Ada Date: 23 Feb 2002 14:48:31 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202231448.379a6d42@posting.google.com> References: <3C5AB0B7.9D75D49A@grammatech.com> <3C7324BF.996E182B@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1014504513 7641 127.0.0.1 (23 Feb 2002 22:48:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Feb 2002 22:48:33 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20316 Date: 2002-02-23T22:48:33+00:00 List-Id: "Matthew Heaney" wrote in message news:... > You should never read data from an external source into a > variable whose type doesn't include all possible values > for its precision. Therefore, 'Valid is still useless That's complete nonsense. Indeed whenever ANYONE on this newsgroup decrees a feature in Ada to be useless. They probably are missing important understanding. After all that person is saying in effect "the people who designed and reviewed Ada 95 are idiots, they put in a feature that is useless, but I am cleverer than all of them and I know it is useless". In fact 'Valid is very useful in many situations.