From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c887193050c097ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-07 17:12:43 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem with GNAT modified GPL and SourceForge Date: 7 Feb 2002 17:12:43 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202071712.1b4567f2@posting.google.com> References: <3C625604.1C948A06@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1013130763 24066 127.0.0.1 (8 Feb 2002 01:12:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Feb 2002 01:12:43 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19745 Date: 2002-02-08T01:12:43+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote in message news:... > I guess anyone can take the initiative to get the GMGPL > approved, but it seems like ACT should, if they want to. We have no particularly interest in getting this license OSI certified. As long as it is acceptable to the GNU project, that's all we care about. We have no objection to someone else following through on this, but please do not wait around for ACT to do it!