From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea41e1f99bbb6556
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-04 17:00:21 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.14p: Is GNAT.Sockets an internal unit?
Date: 4 Feb 2002 17:00:21 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202041700.332950ab@posting.google.com>
References: <64it5uk1o286o33mfvavged1g03aj9to4n@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1012870821 10751 127.0.0.1 (5 Feb 2002 01:00:21
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 Feb 2002 01:00:21 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19611
Date: 2002-02-05T01:00:21+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es> wrote in message news:<64it5uk1o286o33mfvavged1g03aj9to4n@4ax.com>...
> GNAT.Sockets *is* documented in the GNAT Programmer's 
> Reference Manual. Shouldn't the warning be skipped? Or am 
> I missing something?

Sounds like a bug, perhaps you should report it! Posting
something here is not a bug report.