From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c459ff0adb576bc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-03 18:17:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Refactoring and Ada Date: 3 Feb 2002 18:17:51 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202031817.1e8a3d90@posting.google.com> References: <3C5AB0B7.9D75D49A@grammatech.com> <5ee5b646.0202030553.6431291a@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.244 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1012789071 11275 127.0.0.1 (4 Feb 2002 02:17:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Feb 2002 02:17:51 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19572 Date: 2002-02-04T02:17:51+00:00 List-Id: "Nick Roberts" wrote in message news:... > If you're talking about the automated detection of > packages which are eligible to be pre-elaborated, is it > not the case that, in pratice, many packages which are > eligible cannot be detected automatically (because it > depends on dynamic behaviour beyond the grasp of static > analysis)? Complete disconnect here. The conditions for a package to be preelaborated are of course a set of static semantic conditions and are clearly stated in the RM (just look up the pragma in the RM). I can't guess what your confusion is here ...